Controlled-corpus validation completed; live-runtime coverage remains explicitly bounded

MCP Evaluation Framework

Evidence-Driven SAP Testing — Teams need to prove whether an MCP-enabled tester detects seeded defects for the correct reasons rather than merely producing plausible reports or unsupported PASS outcomes.

Ask Twin about this

Representative image

Architecture visual

Shown when a public-safe visual is available for this architecture; otherwise a neutral placeholder is used instead of a broken-image icon.

Context

Who it serves and what it addresses

Adapter Framework, Seeded-Defect Discrimination Framework, clean-artifact baseline, defective-artifact corpus, PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED outcomes, false-PASS prevention, evidence normalisation and deterministic assertions.

Intended users: SAP test architects, MCP developers, quality engineers and AI governance teams evaluating evidence-driven testing systems
Data dependencies: Clean artefact baselines, defective corpora, deterministic assertions, adapter evidence, execution receipts and evaluation metrics.
Last reviewed: 2026-07-27
Maturity: Controlled-corpus validation completed; live-runtime coverage remains explicitly bounded

Core components

Verified architecture vocabulary

Architecture relationship

How the capability connects

Agent Hub: Can expose testing capability as a governed agent-facing service while deterministic evidence remains authoritative.

Engineering Control Center: Provides measurable quality-gate evidence for SAP testing adapters and regression protection.

Evidence-driven SAP testing architecture linked to the SAP Testing MCP Server publication and its Adapter Framework plus Seeded-Defect Discrimination Framework.

Governance and publication

Control and confidentiality boundaries

PASS, FAIL and BLOCKED are explicit. Missing evidence, incomplete execution and unsupported adapters must not be converted into PASS.

Public material describes the evaluation method and boundaries without exposing private corpora, credentials or unrestricted system evidence.

Publication boundary: Public product description and canonical publication relationship only.
Source availability: Selected public architecture material may be released separately
Future direction: Broaden adapters and receipts while preserving deterministic, auditable and bounded evidence claims.

Architecture review template

Decision-ready architecture frame

This page keeps public evidence, maturity and boundaries visible. UNKNOWN means the website has not published enough approved evidence for that dimension.

Problem: Teams need to prove whether an MCP-enabled tester detects seeded defects for the correct reasons rather than merely producing plausible reports or unsupported PASS outcomes.
Enterprise context: SAP test architects, MCP developers, quality engineers and AI governance teams evaluating evidence-driven testing systems
Architecture: Evidence-Driven SAP Testing
Data / control flow: Clean artefact baselines, defective corpora, deterministic assertions, adapter evidence, execution receipts and evaluation metrics.
Authority: PASS, FAIL and BLOCKED are explicit. Missing evidence, incomplete execution and unsupported adapters must not be converted into PASS.
Evidence exists: Evidence-driven SAP testing architecture linked to the SAP Testing MCP Server publication and its Adapter Framework plus Seeded-Defect Discrimination Framework.
Maturity: Controlled-corpus validation completed; live-runtime coverage remains explicitly bounded
Changed since previous version: Last reviewed 2026-07-27; future direction: Broaden adapters and receipts while preserving deterministic, auditable and bounded evidence claims.

Evidence boundary

What the public page does and does not prove

Alternatives considered: UNKNOWN / NOT YET VERIFIED in public evidence for this architecture page.
Why this choice: Adapter Framework, Seeded-Defect Discrimination Framework, clean-artifact baseline, defective-artifact corpus, PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED outcomes, false-PASS prevention, evidence normalisation and deterministic assertions.
What can fail: Insufficient public runtime evidence for a measured failure model. Review integration, evidence availability and authority boundaries before use.
What evidence proves: Evidence-driven SAP testing architecture linked to the SAP Testing MCP Server publication and its Adapter Framework plus Seeded-Defect Discrimination Framework.
What evidence does not prove: Public product description and canonical publication relationship only.
When not to use: Do not use when private credentials, unrestricted SAP writes, unsupported live-system claims or ungoverned model autonomy are required.

Connected from existing metadata

Not yet published: 1 related item identified but hidden until the exact public URL is verified. No broken actions are rendered.