Every public claim on this site traces to a canonical evidence record — categorical maturity, not a fabricated percentage.
Claim: Clean Core decisions require explicit separation of standard capability, released interfaces, side-by-side extension and governed automation.
The public architecture model can frame extension options and governance questions.
It does not prove a specific customer design or target-system activation.
Architecture: SAP Clean Core / BTP extension · Evidence type: architecture-pattern · Validation scope: public website registry
Claim: AI-assisted SAP actions need grounding, deterministic gates, human approval and narrow tool boundaries before consequential writes.
The public model can explain accountable AI architecture boundaries.
It does not authorize any live SAP write or validate a private agent deployment.
Architecture: SAP + AI agent boundary · Evidence type: governance-pattern · Validation scope: public website registry
Claim: Generated ABAP/CDS, activation, runtime behavior and semantic correctness are different evidence levels.
The public model can prevent overclaiming from generation-only evidence.
It does not prove behavior in a private SAP target system.
Architecture: ABAP automation proof · Evidence type: evidence-boundary · Validation scope: public website registry
